Isomorphic Strings
Two strings s and t are isomorphic if the characters in s can be replaced to get t, preserving order and with a one-to-one mapping.
Return True or False.
Example:
egg add
True
- We create two empty mappings to store the character relationships between
sandt. - We iterate over the characters in
sandtsimultaneously, checking if each character insmaps to a unique character int. In this case, 'e' maps to 'a', 'g' maps to 'd', and the second 'g' still maps to 'd'. - Since the mappings are consistent ('e' to 'a' and 'g' to 'd') and one-to-one, we can conclude that
sandtare isomorphic. - The final output is
True, indicating that the strings are isomorphic.
Constraints:
- 1 <= len(s) == len(t) <= 5 * 10^4
- s and t consist of ASCII characters
Background Knowledge
The concept of isomorphic strings revolves around the idea of mapping characters from one string to another while preserving their order and maintaining a one-to-one correspondence. This means that each character in the first string must be uniquely mapped to a character in the second string, and vice versa. The key concept here is the use of hash maps (also known as dictionaries or maps) to keep track of these mappings. A hash map is a data structure that stores key-value pairs, allowing for efficient lookups and insertions.
In the context of isomorphic strings, we can use a hash map to store the mappings between characters in the two strings. For example, if we have two strings s and t, we can create a hash map that maps each character in s to its corresponding character in t. This allows us to efficiently check if a character in s has already been mapped to a character in t, and if so, what that mapping is. The concept of one-to-one mapping is crucial here, as it ensures that each character in s is mapped to a unique character in t, and vice versa.
The problem of determining if two strings are isomorphic is related to the concept of graph theory, where we can think of the characters in the strings as nodes in a graph, and the mappings between them as edges. However, for this problem, we can focus on using hash maps to keep track of the mappings, rather than explicitly constructing a graph.
Algorithm/Approach
The general approach to solving this problem involves iterating through the characters in the two strings and using a hash map to keep track of the mappings between them. We can use a two-hash-map approach, where we maintain two separate hash maps: one for mapping characters from s to t, and another for mapping characters from t to s. This allows us to efficiently check for one-to-one mappings in both directions.
Step-by-Step Strategy
To implement the solution, we can follow these steps:
- Initialize two empty hash maps: one for mapping characters from s to t, and another for mapping characters from t to s.
- Iterate through the characters in the two strings simultaneously.
- For each pair of characters, check if the character from s is already mapped to a character in t using the first hash map. If it is, check if the mapping is consistent with the current character in t.
- If the character from s is not mapped, add a new mapping to the first hash map and check if the character from t is already mapped to a character in s using the second hash map. If it is, return False, as this indicates a non-one-to-one mapping.
- If we complete the iteration without finding any non-one-to-one mappings, return True, indicating that the strings are isomorphic.
Common Pitfalls
Some common pitfalls to watch out for when implementing this solution include:
- Failing to check for one-to-one mappings in both directions.
- Not handling the case where a character in s is mapped to a character in t that is already mapped to a different character in s.
- Not using a hash map to keep track of the mappings, leading to inefficient lookups and insertions.
Time & Space Complexity
The expected time complexity for this solution is O(n), where n is the length of the strings, since we are iterating through the characters in the strings once. The expected space complexity is also O(n), as we are using hash maps to store the mappings, and in the worst case, we may need to store a mapping for each character in the strings.